In this blog post we discuss how best to integrate Human Factors Engineering with Complaint Management. The content from this post was presented at a poster session at the Human Factors Engineering Society’s Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care Conference held in Boston March 2018.
Medical Device Manufacturers need to collect sufficient information and to assign meaningful categories when receiving complaints in order to:
Triage complaints in accordance with regulatory requirements
Tracking and trending to prioritize and address field issues and potential field issues
Perform meaningful root cause analysis of complaints to resolve field issues effectively Medical Device Manufacturers generally have complaint management systems that can robustly analyze product defects unrelated to human error, but complaints related to human error require a slightly different approach.
How can Human Factors best practices help the collection of better data and complaint tracking and trending?
“The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) receives approximately 100,000 Medical Device Reports (MDR) in a given year, approximately one- third of which mention “error” on the part of the device users. The nature of these “errors” is not well documented, making the data difficult to analyze and provide for use in new product development.“ 
Manufacturers are required by law to investigate and report MDRs and Adverse Events:
“It is necessary to expand the definition of a “confirmed complaint” to also encompass reproducible use errors, even when there is no evidence of the product physically malfunctioning. As such, the organization must explore what would qualify as a “valid” use event differently than a quality defect complaint. Use error reporting is not a separate reporting process. It is an additional dimension of information that needs to be observed, documented, and reported within the current processes and systems utilized today both within the clinical environment and by manufacturers.” 
How do I know that I’ve identified Root Cause of a use-related complaint?
If you can identify whether the use error was a slip, lapse, or mistake, then you likely have enough information to know the root cause.
Setting Up Complaints Management System For Success:
UserWise Human Factors Process for Complaint Management:
Link Use Errors in Use FMEA with Complaint Categories
Prepare detailed call center scripts with a line of questioning that aligns with human factors best practices
Make sure that the scripts are usable and make sense within existing call center processes
Adequately prepare persons receiving complaints to collect meaningful information
Collecting incorrect or incomplete information can lead to expensive investigations by large teams of engineers.
Customer service triages complaint with predefined categories
Categories should map to relevant risks and tasks
Allow categories to evolve over time iii. Address all Known Unknowns & Be Ready for Unknown Unknowns
MDRs & Adverse Events will be escalated to the quality team for prompt follow-up
Collect supplemental Human Factors Data by sending human factors engineers to the complaint site to ask open ended questions
Assign Human Factors Engineers to Modernize your Complaint Management System
Save time and money correctly and efficiently identifying root cause of product failures and human error in the field
Close CAPAs instead of being repeatedly haunted by them!
UserWise Can Help Revamp Your Complaint Process:
If you are needing to improve the complaint handling process at your company, contact UserWise to discuss the next steps for integrating human factors principles into the process.
 AAMI TIR50:2014 /(R)2017 Post market surveillance of use error management
 AAMI/IEC 623662007 Medical devices — Application of usability engineering to medical devices
See full poster below: